LIFE TRIAL |
|
---|---|
Problem | Hypertension, LVH |
Format | Double-blinded multi-center RCT |
Treatment | Losartan |
Control | Atenolol |
Population | 9193 |
Inclusion criteria | Men and women 55-80 Previously untreated hypertension LVH on ECG |
Exclusion criteria | Known secondary hypertension Increase of SBP > 200 or DBP > 115 in placebo period Stroke/MI in last 6 months Angina requiring beta-blocker or calcium-channel blocker HF or LVEF <= 40% Creatinine > 160 or solitary kidney Aortic stenosis with gradient > 20 mmHg Other requirements of/contraindications to therapy |
Follow-up | Mean 4.7 years |
Primary endpoint | Composite of cardiovascular death, fatal and nonfatal stroke, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (heart attack) |
Secondary endpoint(s) | Cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, new-onset diabetes mellitus |
Details | . |
Brief summary: | Losartan reduced mortality above atenolol for same BP reduction |
PAPER: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. | |
---|---|
Date | 23 Mar 2002 |
Journal | Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):995-1003. |
Information | Losartan (vs Atenolol) in HTN and LVH -Great reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and death than atenolol -Similar reduction in blood pressure -Better tolerated -Seems to confer benefits beyond reduction in blood pressure |
PAPER: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. | |
---|---|
Date | 23 Mar 2002 |
Journal | Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):1004-10. |
Information | Losartan (vs Atenolol), in those with HTN, DM, LVH -More effective in reducing --Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality --All cause mortality -Seems to have benefits beyond blood pressure reduction. |