PARTNER TRIAL

Problem High-risk AS
Format Double-blinded multi-center RCT
Treatment TAVI or surgical AVR
Control Standard therapy (in those unsuitable for surgery)
Population 699 high-risk patients
Inclusion criteria Must be:
1) Severe aortic stenosis
-Defined as aortic-valve area of less than 0.8 cm2 plus either a mean valve gradient of at least 40 mm Hg or a peak velocity of at least 4.0 m per second
2) NYHA II+
3) High risk - deemed to be at high risk for operative complications or death on the basis of coexisting conditions that were associated with a risk of death of at least 15% by 30 days after the procedure. The final determination of high operative risk was made by surgeons at each study center, but we used as a guideline a score of at least 10% on the risk model developed by the Society for Thoracic Surgeons, which uses an algorithm that is based on the presence of coexisting illnesses in order to estimate the 30-day operative mortality. Less than 5% of patients in the population from which the algorithm was derived had a predicted operative risk (risk score) of more than 10%.

Two groups:
1) Those suitable for surgical repair
-Randomised for TAVI vs. surgery
2) Those unsuitable for surgical repair
-Randomised for TAVI vs. standard therapy (often included balloon aortic valvuloplasty)
Exclusion criteria Bicuspid or noncalcified valve
Coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
Left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 20%
Aortic annulus diameter of less than 18 mm or more than 25 mm
Ssevere (4+) mitral or aortic regurgitation
Recent neurologic event
Severe renal insufficiency
Follow-up 2 years
Primary endpoint Rate of death from any cause
Secondary endpoint(s) Death from cardiovascular causes
NYHA functional class
Repeat hospitalization because of valve- or procedure-related clinical deterioration
Myocardial infarction
Stroke
Acute kidney injury
Vascular complications
Bleeding
6-minute walk distance
Valve performance (as assessed on echocardiography)
Details Crossover between the two study groups was not permitted
Brief summary: TAVI vs. surgery similar mortality, symptoms, stroke. Decrease mortality and symptoms in those not suitable for surgery.
PAPER: Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
Date 9 Oct 2010
Journal N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98.
Information TAVR vs. surgery in high risk patients
-At 30 days
--Reduced all cause death (3.4% vs. 6.5%; p=0.007)
--Increased major vascular complications (11.0% vs 3.2%; p<0.001)
--Similar stroke risk
--Significantly improved symptoms

-At 1 year
--Similar all cause death (24.2% vs. 26.8%; p=0.44; p=0.001 for non-inferiority)
--Similar/increased stroke risk (5.1% vs. 2.4%; p=0.07)
--No significant difference in symptoms
--Decreased major bleeding and new AF
PAPER: Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement
Date 3 May 2012
Journal N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 26. [Epub ahead of print]
Information TAVR vs. surgery in high risk patients
-At 2 years
--Similar rates of death of any cause (33.9% vs. 35.0%; p=0.78)
--Similar rates of stroke (p=0.52)
--Increased rate of paravalvular regurgitation (p<0.001) - itself assoc. with increased late mortality (p<0.001)
PAPER: Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery
Date 21 Oct 2010
Journal N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607.
Information TAVI vs. standard therapy in patients unsuitable for surgery
N.B. Standard therapy includes balloon aortic valvuloplasty
-At 1 year
--Decreased all cause mortality (30.7% vs. 50.7%; p<0.001)
--Decreased composite of death from any cause or repeat hospitalization (42.5% vs. 71.6%; p<0.001)
--Decreased NYHA III/IV in survivors (25.2% vs. 58.0%; p<0.001)

N.B.
-At 30d
--Increased risk of stroke (5.0% vs. 1.1%; p=0.06)
--Increased risk of major vascular complications (16.2% vs. 1.1%; p<0.001)
PAPER: Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Inoperable Severe Aortic Stenosis
Date 3 May 2012
Journal N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 26. [Epub ahead of print]
Information TAVI vs. standard therapy in patients unsuitable for surgery
N.B. Standard therapy includes balloon aortic valvuloplasty
-At 2 years
--Decreased all cause death (43.3% vs. 68.0%; p<0.001)
--Decreased admissions (35.0% vs. 72.5%; p<0.001)
--Improved functional status (p<0.001)
--Increased risk of stroke (13.8% vs. 5.5%, P=0.01; due to ischaemia before 30d, haemorrhage thereafter)